Elms (Ulmus L.) in the Branch “Myrhorod Forestry” of the State Specialized Forest Enterprise “Forests of Ukraine”
ARTICLE PDF

Keywords

Ulmus minor
U. laevis
U. pumila
U. glabra
dominant species
survival rate
forest site conditions Ulmus minor
U. laevis
U. pumila
U. glabra
головні лісоутворювальні види
збереженість
лісорослинні умови

How to Cite

Meshkova, V. L., Kuznetsova, O. A., & Pyvovar, T. S. . (2024). Elms (Ulmus L.) in the Branch “Myrhorod Forestry” of the State Specialized Forest Enterprise “Forests of Ukraine” . Forestry and Forest Melioration, (144), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.144.2024.13

Abstract

Introduction

Elms are spread in forests, landscaping settlements, and protective forest belts. After several waves of elm mortality from Dutch elm disease (DED) in the 20th century, individual populations recovered or formed resistant hybrids. However, epiphytoties of bacterial and fungal diseases sometimes develop, particularly due to pathogen vectoring by bark beetles. In Ukraine, the spread of elms and their damage by different causes are relatively poorly investigated. 

This research aimed to discover the features of Ulmus sp. distribution by stand origin, age, and forest site condition in the forest fund of the Branch “Myrhorod Forestry”.

Materials and Methods

The data as of 2010 and 2017 on the forest fund of enterprises belonging to the Branch “Myrhorod Forestry” of the State Specialized Forest Enterprise “Forests of Ukraine” were selected from the database of Ukrainian State Forest Management Planning Association “Ukrderzhlisproekt” using SQL-query and converted to the *.xls files.

Area distribution by types of forest site conditions was assessed following the Ukrainian school of forest typology. Such distributions for the entire area covered with forest vegetation, for subcompartments with elms in the stand composition, and with elms as the dominant species were compared for various elm species and stand origins, using c2-test. The percentages of stand areas of different origins and elm species in 2010 and 2017 were compared using z-test in the two proportions comparisons.

The data for subcompartments with various elms as the dominant species and as a part of stands composition have been analyzed by 10-year age classes for different origins (natural and planted). The proportion of the stand area of each 10-year age class was assessed for each set of subcompartments. Then the proportion of the stands’ area, which survives up to a certain age, was evaluated.

Results and Conclusions

In the Branch “Myrhorod forestry”, an area of natural stands with Ulmus sp. as the dominant species for 2010–2017, and the proportion of U. minor has significantly increased. The most dramatic decrease in the survival rate of all elm species of natural stands occurred in the VI age class and planted stands in the V age class. Respective natural and planted stands were formed in the 1960s and 1970s when the peak of DED occurred in many regions.

In the Branch “Myrhorod Forestry”, U. minor prefers moist fertile forest site conditions. U. laevis grows mainly in moist forest site conditions, U. pumila occurs in dry to wet habitats, U. glabra is present only in natural stands and absent in plantations. As part of stand composition, the same elm species grow in a wider range of forest site conditions than elms as the dominant species.

2 Figs., 8 Tables, 31 Refs.

https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.144.2024.13
ARTICLE PDF

References

Ali, E., Hudson, O., Waliullah, S., Ji, P., Williams-Woodward, J. and Oliver, J. (2020) ‘First report of bacterial leaf scorch disease of American elm caused by Xylella fastidiosa in Georgia, USA’, Plant Disease. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-19-2367-PDN

Alizadeh, M., Moharrami, M. and Rasuly Pirouzian, A. (2017) ‘Geographic Information System (GIS) as a tool in the epidemiological assessment of wetwood disease on elm trees in Tabriz City, Iran’, Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova, 50. https://doi.org/10.1515/cerce-2017-0018

Atramentova, L.A. and Utevskaya, O.M. (2007) Biometrics. Chapter II. Group comparison and relations analysis. Kharkiv: Ranok (in Ukrainian).

Bondar, O., Rumiantsev, M., Tkach, L. and Obolonyk, I. (2020) ‘Prevailing forest types in the river catchments within the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe zone, Ukraine’, Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A – Forestry, 62(2), pp. 100–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2020-0011

Brasier, C.M. (1991) ‘Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of the current Dutch elm disease pandemics’, Mycopathologia, 115, pp.151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00462219

Brown, N., Vanguelova, E., Parnell, S., Broadmeadow, S. and Denman, S. (2018) ‘Predisposition of forests to biotic disturbance: Predicting the distribution of Acute Oak Decline using environmental factors’, Forest Ecology and Management, 407, pp. 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.054

Chira, D., Borlea, F.G., Chira, F., Mantale, C.?., Cioc?rlan, M.I., Turcu, D.O., Cadar, N., Trotta, V., Camele, I., Marcone, C. and Mang, ?.M. (2022) ‘Selection of elms tolerant to Dutch elm disease in south-west Romania’, Diversity, 14(11), 980. https:// doi.org/10.3390/d14110980

Collin, E., Rondouin, M., Joyeau, C., Matz, S., Raimbault, P., Harvengt, L., Bilger I. and Guibert, M. (2020) ‘Conservation and use of elm genetic resources in France: results and perspectives’, iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 13(1), pp. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3065-013

Dom?nguez, J., Macaya-Sanz, D., Gil, L. and Mart?n, J.A. (2022) ‘Excelling the progenitors: Breeding for resistance to Dutch elm disease from moderately resistant and susceptible native stock’, Forest Ecology and Management, 511, 120113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120113

J?risoo, L., S?da, I., Agan, A. and Drenkhan, R. (2021) ‘Vectors of Dutch elm disease in northern Europe’, Insects, 12(5), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050393

Khodaygan, P., Sedaghati, E. and Sherafati., F. (2011) ‘Isolation of Enterobacter nimipressuralis associated with bacterial wet wood from elm (Ulmus spp.) in Rafsanjan’, Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 4(188), pp. 481–482.

Kuzminski, R., Mazur, A., Lakomy, P., Jelonek, T., Filipiak, M., Napierala-Filipiak, A. and Nowakowska, K. (2024) ‘Scolytus spp. associated with elms with symptoms of Dutch elm disease in Poland and the reproductive potential of Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham, 1802) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae)’, Sylwan, 168(1), pp. 33?47. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2023054

Kuznetsova, O.A., Turenko, V.P., Tovstukha, O.V. and Davydenko, K.V. (2023) ‘Pest and disease incidence of Ulmus sp. in forest shelter belts along the Kyiv-Kharkiv highway’, Forestry and Forest Melioration, 143, pp. 102–111 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.143.2023.102

Mart?n, J.A., Dom?nguez, J., Solla, A., Brasier, C.M., Webber, J.F., Santini, A., Mart?nez-Arias, C., Bernier, L. and Gil, L. (2023) ‘Complexities underlying the breeding and deployment of Dutch elm disease-resistant elms’, New Forests, 54, pp. 661–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09865-y

Mart?n, J.A., Solla, A., Oszako, T. and Gil, L. (2021) ‘Characterizing offspring of Dutch elm disease-resistant trees (Ulmus minor Mill.)’, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 94(3), pp. 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa040

Maslovata, S.A., Mamchur, T.V. and Parubok, M.I. (2016) ‘A collection of herbarium specimens of the genus Ulmus L. in the scientific herbarium of the Uman National University of Horticulture’, Proceedings of conference Prospects of forestry and horticulture: Third Annenkiv readings, UNUS, Uman, 12 May 2016. Uman, pp. 152–157 (in Ukrainian).

Matuszkiewicz, J.M. (2015) ‘Rola wi?z?w w zespo?ach ro?linnych Polski’, in Buga?a, W., Boraty?ski, A. and Iszku?o, G. (eds.) Wi?zy. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Pozna?, Poland, pp. 181–223.

Menkis, A., ?stbrant, I.L., W?gstr?m, K. and Vasaitis, R. (2016) ‘Dutch elm disease on the island of Gotland: monitoring disease vector and combat measures’, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 31, pp. 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1076888

Meshkova, V.L., Kuznetsova, O.A. and Khimenko, N.L. (2022) ‘Occurrence of Ulmus L. in the different forest site conditions of eastern Ukraine’, Forestry and Forest Melioration, 140, pp. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.140.2022.3

Meshkova, V.L., Moroz, S.M. and Kuznetsova, O.A. (2024) ‘Bacterial wetwood of Siberian elm (Ulmus рumila L.) on the south of Ukraine’, Current state, problems and prospects of forest education, science and management, Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine, 19 April 2024. Bila Tserkva: BNAU, p. 215 (in Ukrainian).

Meshkova, V.L., Pyvovar, T.S. and Kuznetsova, O.A. (2023) ‘The age structure of Ulmus L. stands in the eastern regions of Ukraine’, Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 25, pp. 29–38. https://doi.org/10.15421/412302

Napiera?a-Filipiak, A., Filipiak, M., ?akomy, P., Ku?mi?ski, R. and Guba?ski, J. (2016) ‘Changes in elm (Ulmus) populations of mid-western Poland during the past 35 years’, Dendrobiology, 76, pp. 145–156. doi: 10.12657/denbio.076.014

Puzrina, N.V. and Yavny, M.I. (2020) Elm stands of the Kyiv Polissia of Ukraine: silvicultural and health condition. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine (in Ukrainian).

Santini, A. and Faccoli, M. (2015) ‘Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association’, iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8, pp. 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1231-008

Skolskyi, I.M. (2013) ‘Physical properties of Ulmus glabra wood in the conditions of the Western Forest Steppe of Ukraine’, Scientific Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine, 23.15, pp. 33–40 (in Ukrainian).

State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine (2024) General characteristic of Ukrainian forests. Available at: https://forest.gov.ua/en/areas-activity/forests-ukraine/general-characteristic-ukrainian-forests (Accessed: 5 March 2024) (in Ukrainian).

StatisticsLectures.com (2017) Z-Test for Proportions, Two Samples. Available at: http://www.statisticslectures.com/topics/ztestproportions/ (Accessed: 2 March 2024).

Thomas, P.A., Stone, D. and La Porta, N. (2018) ‘Biological flora of the British Isles: Ulmus glabra’, Journal of Ecology, 106(4) pp. 1724–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12994

Tkach, V., Buksha, I., Slych, O. and Pasternak, V. (2021) ‘Optimization of maturity age for coppice oak forests within Left-Bank Forest-Steppe in Ukraine’, Central European Forestry Journal, 67(3), pp. 181–186. https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2020-0026

URIFFM (2019) Improvement of the methods of diagnosing damage to deciduous species by harmful organisms in the forest fund of the State Enterprise “Trostyanetske Forestry” and clarifying the criteria for tree removal by sanitary felling. Report on the research work No. 62. [Meshkova, V., Ed.]. Kharkiv: URIFFM (in Ukrainian).

Yavny, M.I. and Puzrina, N.V. (2018) ‘Bacterial disease of Ulmus glabra Huds. in the stands of the Kyiv Polissia of Ukraine’, Microbiological Journal, 80 (1), pp. 67–76 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/microbiolj80.01.067

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.