Stand productivity dynamics in Eastern Polissia of Ukraine
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

change in growing stock
tree mortality
growing stock increment
site class
forest type зміна запасу
відпад
приріст
клас бонітету
тип лісу

How to Cite

Жежкун , А. М., Жежкун , І. М., & Порохняч , І. В. (2023). Stand productivity dynamics in Eastern Polissia of Ukraine. Forestry and Forest Melioration, (142), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.142.2023.3

Abstract

Introduction

Stemwood volume is a reliable indicator of stand productivity. Many researchers studying productivity use the standing growing stock of specific species without considering dead wood. Understanding the dynamics of forest productivity can optimize forest utilization, ascertain the degree of forest regeneration, and predict stand growth and development. The investigation into the productivity dynamics of tree stands in Eastern Polissia, Ukraine, has not been conducted in recent years. Therefore, this scientific study possesses novelty and relevance.

Materials and Methods

The research was conducted in young and middle-aged stands. The stand productivity was analyzed according to the stem wood – the dominant and most valuable forest product. The total stand productivity consisted of the available growing stock, the stock of dead trees, and the stock of wood removed during improvement felling. The change in forestry and mensuration indicators of the stands was determined in permanent sample plots, which were established according to generally accepted forestry methods.

Results

The productivity of forests in the region is constantly changing and in recent years has shown a tendency to increase. It depends on the species composition, origin, age, stand density, site class, forest type, and the influence of natural factors (fires, windstorms, snowmelt, pests, and diseases). In managed forest stands, the stand productivity is also influenced by a regeneration method (natural regeneration or planting), cultivation method (classical or plantation), timing, and quality of improvement felling.

Reducing the change in the available growing stock of the stands does not take into account the tree mortality rate, which reduces the total productivity. The mortality in terms of the number of trees is greater in younger stands, while in terms of stock, it is higher in older ones. In the stands of mature age, the mortality rates can increase, which is, with other things being equal, the basis for the appointment of final felling. Before carrying out the final felling in the shelterwood system in thinned pine stands with the relative density of stocking of 0.3–0.4, the probability of tree mortality may increase due to the influence of strong winds.

The greatest accumulation of growing stock occurs in middle-aged stands. In the 44-year-old stand growing according to the Іb site class and dominated by Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the composition, for 5 years there was an increase in the average height (by 1.5 m, or 7%) and the average diameter (by 1.1 cm, or 4.3%). Over the next 5-year period, an increase in average height (by 3.5 m, or 15.3%) and average diameter (by 2.9 cm, or 10.9%) was detected. The increase in the difference in average morphometric indicators by more than two times, compared to the previous accounting period, is explained by the increase in the diameter of thicker pine trees and the mortality of thinner ones. The dynamics of growing stock increment with increasing age of the middle-aged pine forest has an upward trend.

Conclusions

The productivity of tree stands according to stem wood stock in the region has a tendency to increase. The highest values of the current average periodic growing stock increment were determined in middle-aged stands. Under forest management intensification, dead-tree wood and growing stock increment should be taken into account to determine the total productivity of stands. During the forest inventory, it is necessary to determine the total productivity and use of deadwood in total wood use, the share of wood use taking into account the total stock increment (with deadwood), not just growing stock changes. Determining the stand productivity dynamics for a certain period will ensure the selection and assigning of measures to increase productivity, provided that their biological stability and durability are preserved, and the protective and environment-creating properties of stands are fulfilled.

3 Figs., 2 Tables, 36 Refs.

https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.142.2023.3
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

About approval of the Instruction on design, technical acceptance, accounting and quality assessment of forestry objects. 2010. [Electronic resource]. Order of the State Forestry Committee of Ukraine №1046/18341 dated November 5. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1046-10#Text (accessed 02.02.2023) (in Ukrainian).

Anuchin, N. P. 1982. Forest Mensuration. Moscow, Lesnaya Promyshlennost, 552 p. (in Russian).

Bessaad, A., Bilger, I., Korboulewsky, N. 2021. Assessing biomass removal and woody debris in whole-tree harvesting system: Are the recommended levels of residues ensured? Forests, 12(6): 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060807

Bontemps, J.-D. 2021. Inflation of wood resources in European forests: The footprints of a big-bang. PLoS ONE 16(11): e0259795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259795

B?hling, K., Marques Todeschini, M. F. 2021. The Forest Sector in the 2030 EU Climate Policy Framework: Looking back to assess its future. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 1–2: 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-18010008

Di Cori, V., Robert, N., Franceschinis, C., Pettenella, D.M., Thiene, M. 2022. Framework proposal to quantify the contribution of non-wood forest products to the European Union forest-based bioeconomy. Forests, 13(3): 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030362.

Forest Code of Ukraine. 1994. [Electronic resource]. Law, Code of January 21, 1994 No. 3852-XII. Edition as of 03/23/2023. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3852-12#Text (accessed 02.02.2023) (in Ukrainian).

Forest Inventory Sample Plots. Establishing Method. Corporate standart 02.02.-37-476:2006. 2007. Valid from May 1, 2007. Kyiv, Ministry for Agrarian Policy of Ukraine, 32 p. (in Ukrainian).

Forestry. Terms and definitions. State Standard of Ukraine 3404-96. 1997. Valid from July 1, 1997. Kyiv, Ukrainian State Forestry Research and Production Technology Center, 39 p. (in Ukrainian).

Fuchilo, Y. D., Karpuk, A. I., Sbitna, N. V. 2016. Ways of increasing the productivity of forests and using wood for energy purposes. Kyiv, Comprint, 206 p. (in Ukrainian).

Kashpor, S. M. and Strochinskiy, A. A. 2013. Forest taxation guide. Kyiv, Vinichenko Publishing House, 496 р. (in Ukrainian).

Lakyda, P. I. 2001. Phytomass of forests of Ukraine. Ternopil, Zbruch, 256 p. (in Ukrainian).

Lier, M., K?hl, M., Korhonen, K. T., Linser, S., Prins, K., Talarczyk, A. 2022. The new EU forest strategy for 2030: A new understanding of sustainable forest management? Forests, 13(2): 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020245.

Melehov, I. S. 1980. Forest Science. Moscow, Lesnaya Promyshlennost, 408 p. (in Russian).

Mensuration and Forest Management. Wood Increment in a Forest Stand. Classification and Notation. Basic Calculation Formulas. Terms and Definitions. Industry standard 56-73-84. 1984. Moscow, Standards Publishing House, 8 р. (in Russian).

Ostapenko, B. F. and Tkach, V. P. 2002. Forest typology. Kharkiv, Pleyada, 204 p. (in Ukranian).

Pogrebnyak, P. S. 1968. General forestry. Moscow, Kolos, 440 р. (in Russian).

Popov V. P., Marynich A. M., Lanko A. I. 1968. Physical and geografical zoning of Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Kyiv, Publishing House of Kyiv University, 683 р. (in Russian).

Porohnyach, I. V. 2017. The current condition and characteristics of formation of spruce stands in Novgorod-Severske Polissya. PhD thesis. Kharkiv, 211 p. (in Ukrainian).

Sanitary Forests Regulations in Ukraine. 2016. [Electronic resource]. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 756 dated 26 October 2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/756-2016-%D0%BF#n11 (accessed 02.02.2023) (in Ukrainian).

Shvydenko, A. Y. and Ostapenko, B. F. 2001. Forest science. Chernivtsi, Zelena Bukovyna, 358 р. (in Ukrainian).

Shvydenko, A. Z., Strochinsky, A. A., Savich, Yu. N., Kashpor, S. N. (Eds.). 1987. Regulatory reference materials for forest inventory in Ukraine and Moldova]. Kyiv, Urozhay, 559 p. (in Russian).

Siryk, A.A., Svistula, G. E., Morozova, T. G. 1991. Productivity and economic assessment of protective forest stands on the Nizhny Dnipro sands. Forestry and Forest Melioration, 93: 3–7 (in Ukrainian).

Spur, S. G. and Barnes, B. V. 1984. Forest ecology. Moscow, Lesnaya Promyshlennost, 479 р. (in Russian).

Tkach, V. P., Kobets O. V., Rumiantsev M. G. 2018. Use of Forest site capacity by forests of Ukraine. Forestry and Forest Melioration, 132: 3–12 (in Ukrainian).

To?go, M., Castagneyrol, B., Jactel, H., Morin, X., Meredieu, C. 2022. Effects of tree mixture on forest productivity: tree species addition versus substitution. European Journal of Forest Reserch, 141: 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01432-6

Turkevich, I. V. 1977. Cadastral valuation of forests. Moscow, Lesnaya Promyshlennost, 168 р. (in Russian).

Turkevich, I. V., Medvedev L. A., Mokshanina I. M., Lebedev V. E. 1973. Methodological recommendations for determining the potential productivity of forest lands and the efficiency of their use. Kharkiv, URIFFM, 72 р. (in Russian).

Vasiliev, P. V. 1962. Potential and effective forest productivity. Forestry, 10: 49–54 (in Russian).

Vedmid, M. M. and Gavrilov, V. A. 2004. To the question of determining the potential productivity of forest lands. Forestry and Forest Melioration, 107: 14–19 (in Ukrainian).

Vedmid, M. M. and Zhezhkun A. M. 2014. Derivatives and low-value stands and their reconstruction in the forests of the Left Bank Ukraine. Sumy, Sumy National Agrarian University, 258 р. (in Ukrainian).

Vorobyov, D. V. 1959. Natural and actual productivity of forest area. Forestry, 11: 10–13 (in Russian).

Yao, R. T., Palmer, D. J., Payn, T. W., Strang, S., Maunder, C. 2021. Assessing the broader value of planted forests to inform forest management decisions. Forests, 6: 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060662

Zhezhkun, A. М. 2012. The dynamics of the derived types of stands of fairly fertile and fertile site types in Eastern Polissia. Scientific Herald of NULES of Ukraine, 171.3: 122–130 (in Ukranian).

Zhezhkun, A. М. 2021a. Forests of the Eastern Polissia of Ukraine: structure, productivity, formation and restoration. Mena, Dominant, 384 р. (in Ukrainian).

Zhezhkun, I. M. 2021b. State and prospects of the use of forest ecosystem services in Ukraine. In: European integration of environmental policy of Ukraine: Proceedings of the 3rd All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference. Odesa, Odesa State Environmental University, р. 110–114 (in Ukrainian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.