Abstract
Introduction
The forests of Ukraine are an important component of the country’s landscape system and perform mainly ecological and social functions. Moreover, forests are a source of various renewable resources, primarily wood.
The availability of complete and objective information about the regional structure of the wood market in Ukraine is very important to create a development strategy for the forestry and woodworking industries, which are producers and consumers of wood resources.
Therefore, the analysis of the forest raw material base of wood harvesting should ensure the effective use of the forest fund for wood production.
The aim of the study was to assess the pre-war state of the forest raw material base of wood production in Ukraine which had to meet the needs of the wood processing industry, in order to use the findings as a basis for further forecasting of the wood market in the country in the post-war period.
Materials and Methods
The analysis of the forest resource base of Ukraine in the pre-war period regarding the production (harvesting) and sale of roundwood was carried out taking into account the territorial characteristics of the country’s regions. The grouping of the State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine by regions and natural zones of Ukraine was used: Polissia or Forest zone (Volyn, Zhytomyr, Rivne, Chernihiv), Forest Steppe (Vinnytsia, Kyiv, Poltava, Sumy, Ternopil, Kharkiv, Khmelnytskyi, Cherkasy), Steppe (Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, Kirovohrad, Luhansk, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Kherson), Carpathians (Zakarpattia, Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv, Chernivtsi), the Crimea.
The input information for the analysis of the regional structure of the forest raw material base of wood production was the Ukrderzhlisproekt Production Association data.
Results
The data on areas and growing stock volumes suitable for wood production are of great importance for the analysis of the forest resource potential of Ukraine. Depending on the main functions performed by forests, they have restrictions on wood harvesting to one degree or another. Therefore, within each category of forests, there are forest areas that are possible for exploitation, i.e. suitable for wood production as well as forests that are unsuitable for wood production (based on nature protection/ecological and economic grounds). The actual or potential use of the forest area for obtaining wood served as the criterion for indicating differences between the specified categories.
More than 50% of the area of forests which belong to the State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine is suitable for wood production. In the exploitation forests, 86% of their area is suitable for wood production, while in the forests with a special mode of use (protective, nature preserving, recreational ones) only 30%. The growing stock in Ukrainian forests increased more than the annual harvesting volume: the ratio of the cuttings to increment (the average increase of the growing stock) volumes was about 60%.
The imbalance between the harvesting volume and the average increment results in a significant accumulation of the growing stock. Actual volumes of timber harvesting were significantly lower than potentially possible in all natural zones. Thus, based on the practice of wood production in European countries, the increase in the volume of cutting in Ukraine is sufficiently justified.
Conclusions
Long-term trends in the development of the forest resource base of Ukraine in the pre-war period were generally stable. During the last decades, the values of the forest area, growing stock, and increment have steadily increased. The specified trend regarding the increase in the volume of forest resources was observed in all regions of Ukraine.
The analysis of the regional features of the forest fund shows the positive dynamics of the potential supply of raw materials in the wood market of the country. The findings confirm that it is able to meet the needs of both domestic wood-processing enterprises and the round timber export.
The conducted analysis of the pre-war state of forest resources of Ukraine in relation to wood production will serve as a basis for further forecasting of the wood market in the post-war period of the country’s economy.
6 Fig., 2 Tables, 23 Refs.
References
A Brief Guide to the Forest Fund of Ukraine Based on Forest Accounting Materials as of January 1, 2002. 2003. Kyiv, State Forestry Committee in Ukraine, 149 p. (in Ukrainian).
A Brief Guide to the Forest Fund of Ukraine (Based on the Materials of the Regular State Accounting of Forests of Ukraine as of 01.01.96). 1998. Kyiv, State Forestry Committee in Ukraine, 101 p. (in Ukrainian).
ANNEX 1: Conversion factors used in the European forest sector outlook study. 2022. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https: www.unece.org/DAM/timber/efsos/data/conversion-factors.pdf (accessed 18.10.2022).
Babuka, R., Sujov?, A., Kup?c?k, V. 2020. Cascade use of wood in the Czech Republic. Forests, 11: 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11060681
Barreiro, S., Schelhaas, M.-J., K?ndler, G., Ant?n-Fern?ndez, C., Colin, A., Bontemps, J.-D., Alberdi, I., Cond?s, S., Dumitru, M., Ferezliev, A., Fischer, Ch., Gasparini, P., Gschwantner, T., Kindermann, G., Kjartansson, B., Kov?csevics, P., Kucera, M., Lundstr?m, A., Marin, G., Mozgeris, G., Nord-Larsen, T., Packalen, T., Redmond, J., Sacchelli, S., Sims, A., Snorrason, A., Stoyanov, N., Th?rig, E. & Per-Erik. 2016. Overview of methods and tools for evaluating future woody biomass availability in European countries. Annals of Forest Science, 73: 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0564-3
Boiko, O. V. and Ivanytska, M. Ia. 2011. The mechanism of forming the strategy of innovative development of forestry enterprises. Marketing and innovation management, 2: 119–123. (in Ukrainian).
Carus, M., Raschka, A., Piotrowski, S. 2010. The Development of instruments to support the material use of renewable raw materials in Germany. [Electronic resource]. Nova-Institut, H?rth, Germany. Available at: http://www.bio-based.eu/policy/en/index.php (accessed 19.07.2021).
Dieste, A., Cabrera, M. N., Clavijo, L., Cassella, N. 2019. Analysis of wood products from an added value perspective: The Uruguayan forestry case. [Electronic resource]. Maderas. Cienc. Tecnol., 21: 305–316. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/485/48561660003/html/ (accessed 19.07.2021).
Directory of the Forest Fund of Ukraine Based on the Materials of the State Forest Register as of January 1, 2011. 2012. Irpin, State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine, Ukrderzhlisproekt, 130 p. (in Ukrainian).
Forest Code of Ukraine. 2006. [Adoption on 2006. Version of the Law No 3404-IV dated 08.02.2006]. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3852-12#Text (accessed 15.10.2022) (in Ukrainian).
Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2019–2020. 2020. [Electronic resource]. United Nations Publication: Geneva, Switzerland, UNECE/FAO. Available at: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/SP-50.pdf (accessed 08.07.2021).
Kindermann, G., Sch?rghuber, S., Linkosalo, T., Sanchez, A., Rammer, W., Seidl, R., Lexer, M. J. 2013. Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios. [Electronic resource]. Carbon Balance Manage., 8: 2. Available at: https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/ articles/10.1186/1750-0680-8-2 (accessed 12.07. 2021).
Kunttu, J., Hurmekoski, E., Myllyviita, T., Kilpel?inen, A. 2021. Substitution and carbon storage impacts of harvested wood products – Effects of increased cascading with different market responses. Carbon Balance and Management. Preprint. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-455738/v1 (accessed 20.07.2021).
Layton, R. J., Arduin, R. H., Yazdeen, H., Pommier, R., Sonnemann, G. 2021. Material flow analysis to evaluate supply chain evolution and management: An example focused on maritime pine in the Landes de Gascogne Forest, France. Sustainability, 13(8) : 4378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084378
Packalen, T., Sallnaes, O., Sirkia, S., Korhonen, K., Salminen, O., Vidal, C., Robert, N., Colin, A., Belouard, T., Schadauer, K., Berger, A., Rego, F., Louro, G., Camia, A., Raty, M., San-Miguel-Ayanz J. 2014. The European Forestry Dynamics Model: Concept, design and results of first case studies. Publications Office of the European Union, EUR 27004. https://doi:10.2788/153990
Poburko, Ya. O. and Shubalyi, O. M. 2007. Methodological principles of strategic planning of the forestry complex of the region. Regional economy, 3: 26–36. (in Ukrainian).
Production of Certain Types of Industrial Products for 2011–2019. 2021. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed 14.10.2021) (in Ukrainian).
Public Report of the Head of the State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine for 2020. 2020. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gnksEnP3cbw5_G-vPklXzUV0lxG_ EqoL /edit (accessed 08.09.2021) (in Ukrainian).
Skliar, Ye. V. and Kushnir, V. D. 2018. Analysis and assessment of directions for improving the resource conservation strategy for forest management in Ukraine. [Electronic resource]. Economy and Society, 16: 612–617. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/16_ukr/93.pdf (accessed 15.10.2022) (in Ukrainian).
The Concept of Forestry Reform and Development. 2006. [Electronic resource]. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated April 18, 2006 No. 208. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/208-2006-%D1%80#Text (accessed 05.06.2022) (in Ukrainian).
Timber Harvest by Region (2000–2020). 2021. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed 11.10.2021) (in Ukrainian).
Torosov, A. S. and Zhezhkun, I. N. 2021. Regional structure of timber harvesting and consumption in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 31(4): 93–97. https://doi.org/10.36930/40310415
Yarova, I. Ye. 2011. Organizational and economic principles of ecologically oriented forestry management. Extended abstract of PhD thesis. Sumy, 22 p. (in Ukrainian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Forestry and Forest Melioration