Abstract
Introduction
More than half of Ukraine’s agroforestry fund consists of 60–70-year-old shelterbelts. As these shelterbelts age, their condition deteriorates, and in the absence of silvicultural management, forest edges encroach into adjacent fields, leading to an increase in their width. This expansion results in a more open structure, reducing their amelioration efficiency. To enhance their protective functions, reducing their width is recommended. One potential solution to this issue is the transformation of existing shelterbelts into silvoarable agroforestry plantings. Such transformation leads to several ecological changes, particularly in the aboveground vegetation cover.
The aim of the study was to assess changes in species and quantitative composition, as well as the prevalence of herbaceous vegetation in shelterbelts that were transformed into linear silvoarable agroforestry plantings.
Materials and Methods
The research was conducted in the northern part of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe across six sample plots in both wide and transformed shelterbelts. The species composition and degree of projective cover of the aboveground vegetation were analyzed using1?1 m2 survey plots with tenfold replication. Phytodiversity of the living aboveground cover was assessed using several ecological indices, including Shannon’s species diversity index, Pielou’s evenness index, and Simpson’s diversity index. The collected data were statistically processed to determine mean values and associated errors.
Results
In classical shelterbelts, the dominance of sylvatic species, along with high projective cover, creates a stable microclimatic environment with high species diversity, which is the result of an environment close to forest phytocoenoses. However, in transformed shelterbelts, ruderal species replace forest vegetation, leading to the formation of agrobiocoenotic plant communities. This suggests that in older shelterbelts with diverse species composition, anthropogenic succession is driving a transition from forest biocenosis to agroforestry ecosystems, accompanied by distinct coenotic changes. An analysis of the coenotic structure of aboveground vegetation revealed that both classical and transformed shelterbelts are characterised by the dominance of sylvatic and ruderal species. However, in classical shelterbelts, sylvatic species accounted for a higher proportion (39.0–49.4%) compared to ruderal species (20.3–42.0%). In contrast, transformed shelterbelts exhibited a clear dominance of ruderal vegetation (22.1-41.3%) over forest species (17.3–31.7%). This shift is attributed to increased light penetration, the dispersal of forest litter, the loss of forest-like microenvironments, and the more open, wind-exposed structure of transformed shelterbelts. In classical shelterbelts, species diversity is influenced by light availability and structural characteristics of the shelterbelts. However, species richness was significantly lower in classical shelterbelts compared to those transformed into silvoarable agroforestry systems.
Conclusions
The transformation of shelterbelts into linear plantings of the silvoarable agroforestry system accelerates successional changes in the aboveground vegetation, leading to desilvatization of herbaceous species and a decline in species diversity. Consequently, transformed shelterbelts experience intensified synanthropization, and are characterised by an increased presence and adaptation of ruderal and meadow vegetation.
3 Figs., 2 Tables, 30 Refs.
References
Andrushchenko, O.P., Rumiantsev, M.H. and Bondar, O.B. (2018) ‘Living aboveground cover in natural oak stands of the Southeastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine’, Forestry and Forest Melioration, 133, pp. 3–9 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.133.2018.3
Forest inventory sample plots. Establishing method. Corporate standard 02.02-37-476:2006. (2007). Valid from May 1, 2007. Kyiv: Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Gilliam, F.S. (2007) ‘The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems’, BioScience, 57, pp. 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199837656.001.0001
Grod, I.M. and Shevchyk, L.O. (2022) ‘Application of informative indices for assessing ecosystem biodiversity’, Ternopil National University of Science and Technology, 5, pp. 112–114 (in Ukrainian).
Hensiruk, S.A. (ed.) (1999) Ukrainian Forestry Encyclopedia. Lviv: UNFU, Vol. 1 (in Ukrainian).
Hladun, H.B. and Hladun, Yu.H. (2013) ‘Prospects for the development of agroforestry in Ukraine’, Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchayev Seria "Soil science, agrochemistry, farming, forestry, ecology of soil", 2, 165–170 (in Ukrainian)
Hladun, H.B., Yukhnovskyi, V.Yu., Suska, A.A., Horoshko, V.V. and Sydorenko, S.V. (2019) ‘Forest amelioration in Ukraine: origins, current state, challenges and prospects’ in Forest restoration and forest amelioration in Ukraine: origins, current state, challenges and prospects in anthropogenic conditions. Kyiv: Publ. Centre of NULES of Ukraine, pp. 249–268 (in Ukrainian).
Hryhora, I.M. and Solomakha, V.A. (2000) Fundamentals of phytocoenology. Kyiv: Phytosociocenter (in Ukrainian).
Instruction for the design and cultivation of protective forest plantations on the lands of agricultural enterprises of the Ukrainian SSR (1979). Кyiv: Ministry of Agriculture (in Ukrainian)
Ivanyuk, I. and Fuchylo, Y. (2020) ‘Vegetation succession after clear cutting in oak forest stands in the conditions of the Western and Central Polissya of Ukraine’, Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 21, pp. 39–49 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15421/412024
Ivanyuk, I.D., Fuchylo, Ya.D. and Landin, V.P. (2022) ‘Dynamics of the species composition of the living aboveground cover of unclosed forest cultures of common oak in fresh conglomerates of Zhytomyr Polissya’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 32(2), pp. 19–26 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.36930/40320203
Ivanyuk, I.D., Ivanyuk, T.M., Krasnov, V.P. and Zhukovskyi, O.V. (2024) ‘Plant composition of the herbaceous-shrub layer of perennial stands and middle-aged cultures of common oak in fresh conglomerates of Zhytomyr Polissya’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 34(4), pp. 13–19 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.36930/40340402
Kovalenko, І.М. (2015) ‘Grass and subshrub layer as a structural component of forest communities in the North-East of Ukraine’, Chornomorskyi Botanical Journal, 11 (2), pp. 146–155 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/15.112/2
Krasnov, V.P., Shelest, Z.M. and Davydova, I.V. (2014) Phytoecology with the basics of forestry. Kherson: OLDI-PLUS (in Ukrainian)
Lobchenko, G. (2014) ‘Windbreaks strips as a forest biocenosis’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 24(10), pp. 59–65 (in Ukrainian).
Lobchenko, G. (2015) ‘Coenotic structure of the herbaceous layer of the phytocenosis of windbreaks’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 25(1), pp. 130–136. Available at: https://nv.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/804 (Accessed: 22 October 2024) (in Ukrainian).
McCarthy, B.C. (2003) ‘The Herbaceous Layer of Eastern Old-Growth Deciduous. The Herbaceous Layer in forests of Eastern North America’ in Gilliam, F.S. and Roberts, M.R. (eds) The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America (New York, NY, 2003; online edn, Oxford Academic, 31 Oct. 2023), pp. 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195140880.003.0006
Mirkin, B.M., Rosenberg G.S. and Naumova, L.G. (1989) A comprehensive dictionary of modern phytocenology terms. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Moreno, G., Pardini, A., McAdam, J.H., Papanastris, V. and Burgess, P.J. (2012) ‘Past, Present and Future of Agroforestry Systems in Europe’ in Nair, P. and Garrity, D. (eds) Agroforestry – The Future of Global Land Use. Advances in Agroforestry, vol. 9. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_16
Nair, P.R. and Garrity, D. (2012) Agroforestry – The Future of Global Land Use. Dordrecht: Springer.
Nair, P.K.R. (1985) ‘Classification of agroforestry systems’, Agroforestry Systems, 3, pp. 97–128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00122638
Paianok, T. and Zadorozhnia, T. (2020) Statistical data analysis. Irpin: University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Popovych, S., Yakubenko, B., Ustymenko, P., Dubyna, D. and Churilov, A. (2017) Geobotany: methodological aspects of research. Kyiv: Lira-K (in Ukrainian).
Prydatko, V.I., Kolomytsev, R.I., Burda, R.I. and Chumachenko, S.M. (2008) Landscape Ecology: A teaching and methodological guide to biodiversity modeling and consideration of impacts on it’ Kyiv: Publ. House of the National Agrarian University (in Ukrainian).
Soroka, М.І. (2012) ‘Ecological prerequisites for the formation and differentiation of Roztochia’s vegetation’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 22.6, pp. 8–13 (in Ukrainian).
Sydorenko, S.V., Pasternak, V.P., Sydorenko, S.H. and Hladun, H.B. (2019) ‘Peculiarities of the formation of phytomass and deadmass reserves in oak windbreaks of the Forest-Steppe part of the Kharkiv region’, Forestry and Forest Melioration, 134, pp. 104–116. https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.134.2019.104
Yakubenko, B.E., Popovych, S.Yu. and Ustimenko, P.M. (2019) Geobotany. 2nd edn’. Kyiv: Lira-K (in Ukrainian).
Yukhnovskyi, V.Yu., Dudarets, S.M., Maliuha, V.M. and Sovakov, O.V. (2024) Agroforestry. Kyiv: Publ. Centre of NUBIP (in Ukrainian).
Yukhnovskyi, V.Yu., Levandovska, S.M. and Khryk, V.M. (2013) Atlas of phytoindicators of forest-vegetation condition types of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Bila Tserkva: Bila Tserkva Publ. House (in Ukrainian).
Yukhnovsky, V. and Yosypenko, V. (eds.) (2012) Guidlines on forest reclamation and arrangement of protective forest plantations of linear type. Kyiv: Komprint (in Ukrainian).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.