Abstract
Introduction
Global warming and climate change pose a serious threat to the stable functioning of the biosphere. Among vegetation types, forest ecosystems are among the most vulnerable to climate change, as they are highly sensitive to shifts in optimal environmental conditions. Increasing summer temperatures threaten the decline of certain tree species and the spread of new, including invasive, species, which may alter species composition and reduce forested areas. Rising winter temperatures may also contribute to the expansion of pest species and pathogens, such as bark beetles, which are already causing extensive dieback in coniferous forests. Changes in precipitation patterns, intensity, and frequency further negatively affect forest ecosystems, leading to deterioration in forest health, widespread stand decline, and increased wildfire risk.
Materials and Methods
The study of reforestation processes in the forests of the Vyhodsky Forestry Management Unit of the “Carpathian Forest Office” Branch was based on the results of the authors’ own research, departmental records for 2019–2021 covering 270 sites with a total area of 271.4 ha, as well as domestic and international scientific and practical experience in forest regeneration.
Results
The forest regeneration fund consists mainly of recent clear-cuts within beech–fir–spruce, beech–spruce–fir, pure spruce, spruce–fir–beech, and fir–spruce forest types. Their regeneration is planned through either natural or artificial methods. In most cases, the determining criterion is the quantitative and qualitative composition of natural regeneration, including the presence of self-seeded trees and advance growth. Artificial regeneration is carried out on a forest typological basis where natural regeneration is insufficient or where its species composition does not correspond to the target forest type. Forest plantations are established as mixed stands composed mainly of fir, beech, sycamore maple, and larch. Their planting density depends on the amount of existing natural regeneration.
Conclusions
The forest regeneration fund of the Vyhodskyi Forestry Management Unit of the “Carpathian Forest Office” Branch consists mainly of recently harvested areas following final felling (clear-cutting and the final stage of selective felling) as well as clear sanitary felling. During the three-year study period, 30% of the area was regenerated artificially, while 70% was regenerated naturally. In most of the clear-cut areas subjected to artificial regeneration, natural regeneration of mixed species composition was already present; however, its quantity was insufficient to ensure successful stand formation. The tree species introduced into newly established forest plantations included fir, beech, sycamore maple, larch, and spruce. In some cases, spruce accounted for up to seven units in the stand composition, which may be considered excessive under current environmental conditions. Artificial forest regeneration is carried out on a forest typological basis; however, under present conditions, the impacts of climate change must also be taken into account. The analysis of the quantitative and qualitative composition of natural regeneration in areas designated for artificial afforestation demonstrates considerable potential for changing regeneration approaches and increasing the proportion of natural regeneration through the application of close-to-nature forestry principles.
1 Fig., 1 Table, 13 Refs.
References
Belko, M., Tu?ekov?, A., Longauer, R., Longauerov?, V., Ma?ejovsk?, V. and Horv?t, I. (2024) ‘Research on an e?ective arti?cial regeneration method for selected commercially important coniferous tree species on a large sanitation cut site situated in the Javorn?ky Mts., Western Carpathians’, Journal of Forest Science, 70(7), pp. 353–367. https://doi.org/10.17221/1/2024-JFS
Buksha, I.F., Shvidenko, A.Z., Bondaruk, M.A., Tselishchev, O.G., Pyvovar, T.S., Buksha, M.I., Pasternak, V.P. and Krakovska, S.V. (2017) ‘Methodology for modeling and assessing the impact of climate change on forest phytocenoses in Ukraine’, Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Series: Forestry and Ornamental Horticulture, 266, pp. 26–38 (in Ukrainian).
Debrynyuk, Yu.M. (2011) ‘The dying of spruce forests: Causes and consequences’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 21.16, pp. 32–38 (in Ukrainian).
Deyneka, A.M. (2009) ‘Forestry in the conditions of global climate change: risks, opportunities, and adaptation strategies’, Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 19.14, pp. 108–118 (in Ukrainian).
Gensiruk, S.A. (1964) The forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians and their use. Kyiv: Urozhay (in Ukrainian).
Gudyma, V.M. and Sishchuk, M.M. (2022) Report on the Provision of Services Under Contract No. 43/21 “Data Collection and Monitoring of Forest Regeneration at the Vyhodsky Forestry Enterprise”. Ivano-Frankivsk: UkrRIMF (in Ukrainian).
Koval, Yu.V. (2010) ‘Forest ecosystems in the context of ecological and economic security’, Economics and Environmental Sustainable Development, 2010, pp. 4–11. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/169600/01-Koval.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed: 10 March 2026) (in Ukrainian).
Kramarets, V.O., Popovich, M.V. and Boiko O. Z. (2019) ‘Natural regeneration in secondary spruce stands – what to expect? in Forest regeneration and forest reclamation in Ukraine: origins, current status, contemporary challenges, and prospects, p. 46 (in Ukrainian).
Lavnyy, V.V. and Schnitzler, G. (2014) ‘Experience of conversion cuttings in the spruce forests of Germany’, Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 12, pp. 73–78. Available at: http://fasu.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/nplanu/article/view/138 (Accessed: 10 March 2026) (in Ukrainian).
McDonald, P.M. (1991) ‘Container seedlings outperform barefoot stock: Survival and growth after 10 years’, New Forests, 5, pp.147–156.
Parpan, V.I., Makovsky, G.M., Oliynyk V.S. and Chistiakova A.A. (1988) Recommendations for improving afforestation in oak and beech forests of the Carpathians using modern logging methods and timber harvesting technologies. Ivano-Frankivsk (in Russian).
Pavlishchuk, O.P. and Kravets, P.V. (2016) Strategy for the development of Ukraine’s forestry sector in the context of climate change’, in International Strategy of Region Economic Development. Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific and Practical Conference (Sumy, Ukraine, 17 March 2016). Sumy: Sumy State University, pp. 76–78 Available at: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream-download/123456789/48804/1/Pavlischyk_Climate.pdf (Accessed: 10 March 2026) (in Ukrainian).
Shvidenko A. (2009) ‘Non-boreal forests of Eastern Europe in a changing world: the role in the Earth systems’, in Groisman, P.Y., Ivanov, S.V. (eds) Regional Aspects of Climate-Terrestrial-Hydrologic Interactions in Non-boreal Eastern Europe. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2283-7_14

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
