Features of natural reforestation of clear-cuts in the Ukrainian Carpathians
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)


fresh clear-cuts
natural regeneration
type-forming species
quantitative composition
species composition
renewal свіжі зруби
природне відновлення
типоутворювальні породи
кількісний склад
видовий склад

How to Cite

Бродович , Ю. Р., Бродович , Р. І., Кацуляк , Ю. Д., & Сіщук , М. М. . (2022). Features of natural reforestation of clear-cuts in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Forestry and Forest Melioration, (141), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.33220/1026-3365.141.2022.3



Improving the reproduction of Ukraine’s forest resources is nowadays an urgent issue. Experience shows that when choosing one or another reforestation method (natural or artificial), priority should be given to silvicultural and typological factors, not just economic ones.

Materials and Methods

The study was based on the departmental data (projects of natural reforestation for 2022) of 12 state forest enterprises, 107 forestries, and 816 clear-cut plots designed for natural reforestation in the State Forest Fund of Transcarpathian and Chernivtsi regions. We also used the materials of research carried out in previous years by Ukrainian Research Institute of Mountain Forestry.


The research established that as a result of various types of felling, in the mountainous conditions of the Ukrainian Carpathians, about 8.5 thousand hectares of clear-cuts appear annually. Reforestation of cut areas is carried out by various methods, e.g. by leaving cut areas for natural reforestation, by planting forest stands (partial or continuous), or by combining these methods. The ratio of these methods has changed significantly in recent years. If until the 2000s, the vast majority of cut areas (70–80%) were reforested by planting trees, nowadays most of them are left for natural reforestation.


  1. Main shortcomings in the design of the natural reforestation method in Ukrainian Transcarpathia occur in the beech and spruce formations of forests after the felling of secondary stands. In particular, there is insufficient white fir amount in the composition of natural regeneration in the case of spruce-fir beech forests and beech forests as well as insufficient English or sessile oak regeneration in oak-hornbeam-beech forests. In the spruce formation, especially after the felling of secondary conifer stands affected by diseases, pests, and windstorms, European spruce is mostly dominant in natural regeneration in cut areas. This, in turn, is a threat of re-emergence of outbreaks and diseases.
  2. The natural method of clear-cut reforestation has dominated in the State Forest Fund of Chernivtsi Regional Department of Forest and Hunting Management for a long time due to the wide usage of gradual and reforestation felling. However, a number of deviations from silvicultural and typological requirements were also found here. In particular, it concerns fresh and wet hornbeam oak forests, as well as oak and spruce forests, where a small number (600–800 stems·ha-1) of the second type-forming species, namely common oak, is recorded on cut areas. In the spruce formation of the Bukovyna forests, the study revealed a similar situation to the one in Ukrainian Transcarpathia.
  3. The article contains specific proposals regarding the necessity to improve the species composition of self-growth and undergrowth in the analysed forest types and to partially clarify the current regulatory requirements regarding the assessment of natural regeneration on cut areas that are designed for natural reforestation in the Ukrainian Carpathians.

3 Tables, 15 Refs.

ARTICLE PDF (Українська)


Brodovych, R. I. 2012. Optimal systems, methods and ways of reforestation in the context of forest formations in the Ukrainian Carpathians. In: Scientific Foundations of Balanced Forest Management in the Carpathian Region. Collection of Recommendations. Ivano-Frankivsk, UkrRIMF, р. 93–231 (in Ukrainian).

Brodovych, Yu. R. 2016. The current state and ways of improving the restoration processes of beech mountain forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Extended abstract of PhD thesis. Ivano-Frankivsk, 21 р. (in Ukrainian).

Brodovych, R. I. 2017. Recommendations for reproduction of sustainable stands in windy, disease-affected areas and in recreational and health forests of the Carpathians. Ivano-Frankivsk, UkrRIMF, 43 р. (in Ukrainian).

Brodovych, R. I., Gavrusevych, А. M., Oliynyk, V. S. 2006. Improvement of regulatory requirements regarding natural and artificial reforestation in the Carpathians. Forestry and Forest Melioration, 109: 41–44 (in Ukrainian).

Brodovych, R. I., Katsulyak, Yu. D., Yatsik, R. M., Golubchak, O. I., Hayda, Yu. I., Sishchuk, M. M., Yunyk, T. R., Brodovych, Yu. R., Fennych, V. S., Herbut, F. F., Gudyma, V. D., Sishchuk, N. M., Gudyma, V. M., Shtogrin, A. S. 2022. Targeted reforestation in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Ivano-Frankivsk, Prosvita LLC, 249 р. (in Ukrainian).

Chernyavskyi, M. V., Krynytskyi, G. T., Parpan V. I. 2006. Forestry close to nature in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Lviv, Pyramid, 88 p. (in Ukrainian).

Debryniuk, Yu. M., Osmola, M. H., Myakush, I. I., Melnyk, O. S. 1994. Afforestation in the western region of Ukraine. Lviv, World, 408 p. (in Ukrainian).

Forest Reproduction Guidelines. 2007. Approved by the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated March 1, 2007 No. 303. Kyiv, 5 р. (in Ukrainian).

Gavrusevych, А. М. 2018. Scientific support of UkrRIMF processes of reproduction of forest resources of the Ukrainian Carpathians and adjacent territories. In: The Main Problems and Trends of the Further Development of Forestry in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Ivano-Frankivsk, р. 38–47 (in Ukrainian).

Gensiruk, S. A. and Maksimets, O. V. 2004. Anthropogenic changes in the forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians and their consequences. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 3: 17–21.

Gudyma, V. D. 2018. Forest use in the mountain forests of the Ukrainian. In: Actual problems of Forestry and Horticulture. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Uman, р. 65–66 (in Ukrainian).

Instructions on Design, Technical Acceptance, Accounting and Quality Assessment of Silviculture Objects. 2010. Approved by order of the State Forestry Committee of Ukraine dated August 19, 2010 No. 260. Kyiv, 73 р. (in Ukrainian).

Maurer, V. M., Pinchuk, A. P., Kosenko, Yu. I. 2019. Reforestation and forest improvement in Ukraine: origins, current state, current challenges and prospects in the conditions of the Anthropocene. Kyiv, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, p. 45–67.

Parpan, V. I. 1999. Ecological and economic principles of mountain forestry. Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian University. Dnipropetrovsk, р. 129–32 (in Ukrainian).

Parpan, V. I. 2018. Recommendations for forest management in native fir groves of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Ivano-Frankivsk, NAIR, p. 203–235 (in Ukrainian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Forestry and Forest Melioration